<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Ears on Justice</title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/Podcast.html</link>
<description>Justice at Stake is a nonpartisan campaign working to keep our courts fair and impartial. Justice at Stake Campaign partners educate the public and work for reforms to keep politics and special interests out of the courtroom—so judges can do their job protecting our Constitution, our rights and the rule of law. New episodes of this podcast will be released twice monthly and discuss timely issues affecting the independence of the judiciary. Check us out online at http://www.justiceatstake.org</description>
<generator>iWeb 1.1.2</generator>

<ttl>60</ttl>
<itunes:subtitle>Justice at Stake is a nonpartisan campaign working to keep our courts fair and impartial. Justice at Stake Campaign partners educate the public and work for reforms to keep politics and special interests out of the courtroom—so judges can do their </itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>Justice at Stake is a nonpartisan campaign working to keep our courts fair and impartial. Justice at Stake Campaign partners educate the public and work for reforms to keep politics and special interests out of the courtroom—so judges can do their job protecting our Constitution, our rights and the rule of law. New episodes of this podcast will be released twice monthly and discuss timely issues affecting the independence of the judiciary. Check us out online at http://www.justiceatstake.org</itunes:summary>
<itunes:image href="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/http%3A/www.mac.com/st/1/sharedassets/1.1/Common/Templates/Gazette/About%20Me/Seperator%203-1.jpg"/>
<itunes:category text="Audio Blogs"/>
<copyright>Justice at Stake Campaign</copyright>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Episode 14: Judicial Ethics</title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/A79C1B4B-C7F9-48DF-AD29-F60905813EE7.html</link>
<guid>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/A79C1B4B-C7F9-48DF-AD29-F60905813EE7.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:59:52 -0400</pubDate>
<description>Earlier this year, the American Bar Association approved a new model code of judicial conduct.  The model code provides suggestions to state judiciaries as they update ethics cannons for their judges.  One of the thorniest issues the ABA had to confront was the issue of when a judge should disqualif</description>
<enclosure url="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/A79C1B4B-C7F9-48DF-AD29-F60905813EE7_files/Ears%20on%20Justice%206-14-7.m4a" length="7779060" type="audio/x-m4a"/>
<itunes:duration>00:15:39</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>Earlier this year, the American Bar Association approved a new model code of judicial conduct.  The model code provides suggestions to state judiciaries as they update ethics cannons for their judges.  One of the thorniest issues the ABA had to confront w</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>Earlier this year, the American Bar Association approved a new model code of judicial conduct.  The model code provides suggestions to state judiciaries as they update ethics cannons for their judges.  One of the thorniest issues the ABA had to confront was the issue of when a judge should disqualify him or herself from a case.  In this podcast, we hear from a leading national expert, Indiana Law Professor Charlie Geyh, who served as a staff person to the ABA commission that conducted the code update.  Geyh is also a member of the board of directors of Justice at Stake.  We thank the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Judicial Independence for permission to use this recording, which was made in August of 2007 at a panel discussion in San Francisco.  &#13;</itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
<title>Episode 13: Lithwick on the Supreme Court</title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/94763451-0FC9-4B62-B7CB-256D31E5504F.html</link>
<guid>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/94763451-0FC9-4B62-B7CB-256D31E5504F.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:53:40 -0400</pubDate>
<description>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be presenting you with more highlights from our Seventh Annual Justice at Stake Summer Workshop. We will hear from Slate Magazine’s Dahlia Lithwick. Lithwick gave an interesting  discussion on the growing relationship between the Supreme Court and the medi</description>
<enclosure url="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/94763451-0FC9-4B62-B7CB-256D31E5504F_files/Ears%20Episode%2013.m4a" length="7304873" type="audio/x-m4a"/>
<itunes:duration>00:14:42</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be presenting you with more highlights from our Seventh Annual Justice at Stake Summer Workshop. We will hear from Slate Magazine’s Dahlia Lithwick. Lithwick gave an interesting  discussion on the growing</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be presenting you with more highlights from our Seventh Annual Justice at Stake Summer Workshop. We will hear from Slate Magazine’s Dahlia Lithwick. Lithwick gave an interesting  discussion on the growing relationship between the Supreme Court and the media. She also gave interesting commentary on the the first term of the Roberts’ court.</itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
<title>Episode 12: Mudslinging Judges</title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/1AF3638A-8CFC-4A81-B994-00DD5BAB6EF4.html</link>
<guid>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/1AF3638A-8CFC-4A81-B994-00DD5BAB6EF4.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:33:57 -0400</pubDate>
<description>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be offering you some of the highlights from a May 23rd, 2007 conference presented by The Annenberg Political Fact Check. The conference called, “Mudslinging Judges,” included comments from a number of political consultants to judicial candidates. The panel</description>
<enclosure url="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/1AF3638A-8CFC-4A81-B994-00DD5BAB6EF4_files/New%20Podcast1.m4a" length="8237712" type="audio/x-m4a"/>
<itunes:duration>00:16:38</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be offering you some of the highlights from a May 23rd, 2007 conference presented by The Annenberg Political Fact Check. The conference called, “Mudslinging Judges,” included comments from a number</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>In this edition of Ears on Justice, we will be offering you some of the highlights from a May 23rd, 2007 conference presented by The Annenberg Political Fact Check. The conference called, “Mudslinging Judges,” included comments from a number of political consultants to judicial candidates. The panelists included Vivica Novak, Jeff Roe, and David Brown.</itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
<title>Episode 11: Ifill on Diversity</title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/8086776D-025D-47CB-BA69-4BF2C1456DE5.html</link>
<guid>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/8086776D-025D-47CB-BA69-4BF2C1456DE5.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02:58 -0400</pubDate>
<description>&lt;a href="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/8086776D-025D-47CB-BA69-4BF2C1456DE5_files/Ifill%20Podcast-1.m4a"&gt;&lt;img src="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/Images/0,0,1440,144045224a85_66e12db8_55b04cae.png" style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-bottom:10px; width:120px; height:120px;"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;In this episode of Ears on Justice we will hear from Professor Sherrilyn Ifill of the University of Maryland Law School. Professor Ifill offered some interesting insights on the next steps towards achieving true diversity on America’s benches. These comments were taken from the Seventh Annual Justic</description>
<enclosure url="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/8086776D-025D-47CB-BA69-4BF2C1456DE5_files/Ifill%20Podcast-1.m4a" length="7269586" type="audio/x-m4a"/>
<itunes:author>Raheem Dawodu Jr.</itunes:author>
<itunes:duration>00:14:37</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Ears on Justice we will hear from Professor Sherrilyn Ifill of the University of Maryland Law School. Professor Ifill offered some interesting insights on the next steps towards achieving true diversity on America’s benches. Thes</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>In this episode of Ears on Justice we will hear from Professor Sherrilyn Ifill of the University of Maryland Law School. Professor Ifill offered some interesting insights on the next steps towards achieving true diversity on America’s benches. These comments were taken from the Seventh Annual Justice at Stake Summer Workshop.</itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
<title>Episode 10: Habeas Corpus for Enemy Combatants </title>
<link>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/F4FDF771-CD60-4F70-8DBD-FF78FE6809F8.html</link>
<guid>http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/F4FDF771-CD60-4F70-8DBD-FF78FE6809F8.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:02:51 -0400</pubDate>
<description>&lt;a href="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/F4FDF771-CD60-4F70-8DBD-FF78FE6809F8_files/Ears%20on%20Justice%206-1-7.m4a"&gt;&lt;img src="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/Images/0,0,300,3009a4c39a5_53b69157_835ceaa9.jpg" style="float:left; padding-right:10px; padding-bottom:10px; width:120px; height:120px;"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This edition of Ears on Justice features comments and remarks made by panelists at an May 17, 2007 program organized by  Justice at Stake Campaign’s partner organizations, the Constitution Project and the Brennan Center for Justice.  The panelists discussed Congress' current consideration whether to</description>
<enclosure url="http://web.mac.com/justiceatstake/iWeb/Ears%20on%20Justice/Podcast/F4FDF771-CD60-4F70-8DBD-FF78FE6809F8_files/Ears%20on%20Justice%206-1-7.m4a" length="9050296" type="audio/x-m4a"/>
<itunes:author>Justice at Stake Campaign</itunes:author>
<itunes:duration>00:18:11</itunes:duration>
<itunes:subtitle>This edition of Ears on Justice features comments and remarks made by panelists at an May 17, 2007 program organized by  Justice at Stake Campaign’s partner organizations, the Constitution Project and the Brennan Center for Justice.  The panelists </itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>This edition of Ears on Justice features comments and remarks made by panelists at an May 17, 2007 program organized by  Justice at Stake Campaign’s partner organizations, the Constitution Project and the Brennan Center for Justice.  The panelists discussed Congress' current consideration whether to clarify the jurisdiction of the federal courts to hear habeas corpus claims being made by detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Panelists included Jonathan Hafetz of the Brennan Center for Justice; Lieutenant Commander William C. Kuebler, Judge Advocate General's Corps, United States Navy, Defense Counsel, Office of Military Commissions; Hon. Patricia Wald, former Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; William H. Taft, IV, former Legal Advisor, Department of State, George W. Bush Administration.&#13;&#13;&#13;&#13;&#13;</itunes:summary>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
